As China
and India garner an ever increasing share of the world’s attention, it has
become almost fashionable to discount the future of Japan. The arguments
against a significant role for Japan in the twenty-first century are all
summarized, more or less,
in a recent article in the Washington Post:
“For Japan, a Long, Slow Slide” Japan is not the juggernaut that it was in
the 1980s. Its population is aging. India and China are growing much faster.
Et cetera, et cetera.
These
negatives---while not insignificant--- are only half of the story; and this
pessimistic piece appropriately pulls its punches:
Still…..this remains a remarkably comfortable middle-class country, with
good health care and infrastructure and a low crime rate.
Unemployment is at a 10-year low of 3.9 percent, although wages are
stagnant or declining. Thanks to six consecutive years of (relatively
slow) growth, the panic and deflation that accompanied the bursting of
Japan's real estate bubble in the 1990s are gone.
The author
of the article, Blaine Harden, also acknowledges that Japan is still the
second largest economy in the world. Yet he notes Japan’s status as number
two only in passing. After stunning the world with the “Japanese Miracle” of
the 1960s and the “Bubble Economy” of the 1980s, Japan’s current state of
slow, steady prosperity inevitably invites predictions of a “decline.”
We forget
just how big Japan was in
the late 1980s. There were many pundits in the West back then who believed
that this island nation of 127 million people was poised to take over the
world. Now Japan is revealed as merely a prosperous country with an agenda
appropriate to its size. And this strikes many as anticlimactic.
Traditionally described as “a shrimp off the coast of China,” Japan Inc.
still casts a long shadow. Chinese automobile companies like Chamco make the
news because they may become viable players within the next few years. But a
Japanese automaker, Toyota, is already poised to become the largest
automaker in the world by 2010.
Japan is
not a developing nation; but a member of the G-7. Japanese successes no
longer have an air of novelty. While investors and journalists romanticize
China and India for what they might become, Japan has already
arrived; and it is constantly measured against its best performances of the
past.
Japan’s
relative position has indeed slipped since the early 1990s,
especially in Asia. (Read the Washington Post article for details.) But this
is an example of how raw statistics can be misleading. In the early 1990s,
China
and India were still economic basket cases, and no one even thought about
doing business in Vietnam. While the rest of Asia is indeed rising, this
does not necessarily mean the decline of Japan.
Japan is already number two in
the world. China
and India have nowhere to go but up.
Much has
been made of Japan’s aging
population. This is a real concern, but hardly unique in the industrialized
economies. Germany, Italy, France, Spain and most of Europe are aging
significantly faster than the developing world.
Russia
is experiencing a population decline that has alarmed the Putin government;
the direst forecasts put Russia’s population (now 141 million) as low as 70
million by 2050.
Nor is an
aging (or even a declining) population irreversible. Japan’s population
growth was flat throughout much of the Tokugawa Period (1615-1867), just
prior to Japan’s rise as a major Asian power in the twentieth century. The
population of Greece declined during the Greek Dark Age (1100 – 750 BC),
only to increase during the subsequent age of the Greek city states.
Will Japan
ever stun us again, as it did in the 1960s or the 1980s? Not likely---at
least not in our lifetime. But stunning performances are more difficult to
pull off when you’re already close to the top.
Japan is not a
BRICs country; it isn’t the latest thing anymore. But Japan is still an
economic contender; and you can expect it to remain so in the foreseeable
future.