Iran, Britain, and Russia
The Safavid Dynasty
was swept away in 1795, when a Turkic group called the Qajars took
control of Iran. The Qajars inherited an economically weak country.
Moreover, the long decline of the Safavids had debilitated the central
government.
Despite these
unfavorable internal conditions, the Qajars had imperial ambitions.
Persia fought a war with Russia in 1804 over Georgia. The czar’s troops
defeated the Persians; and the subsequent treaty transferred existing
Persian territory in the Caucasus to Russia.
Great Britain and Russia were
perennial rivals throughout the nineteenth century. (The two nations
would go to war in the Crimea before the century’s end.)
Persia’s rulers were eager to exploit this rivalry by leveraging Great
Britain against Russia. Ten years after Russia pummeled Persia over
Georgia, Britain and the Shah of Iran signed the Definitive Treaty of
1814. Under the terms of the treaty, Britain was permitted to maintain
troops in Iran; and it was the only European nation to be given this
right. The treaty also included provisions for British officers to train
Persian troops.
The shah waited
scarcely more than a decade to test the new alliance. Persia declared
war on Russia in 1826 in the hope of regaining the lost territories of
the Caucasus. But Great Britain was now temporarily allied with Russia
in the Greek War of Independence. No British troops came to the shah’s
aid. The result was another horrible defeat for Persia. The Treaty of
Turkmanchai (1828) reaffirmed Persia’s earlier land losses in the
Caucasus. Persia was also forced to pay
war reparations to the czar.
The Qajar rulers of
Iran faced more economic problems as the nineteenth century progressed.
The Industrial Revolution brought efficient mass production methods to
the factories of Europe. Iran’s household-based, craft industries could
not compete. Middle class artisans saw their livelihoods swept away as
cheap foreign goods flooded the markets of the country.
The national
currency was also assaulted by worldwide economic trends. The Persian
dinar was based on silver; and silver prices declined in the 1800s.
Then, as now, a drop in the value of a nation’s currency had disastrous
effects. Inflation spiraled out of control, reaching levels of 500 –
600% during the mid-1800s.
These externally
imposed difficulties would have been damaging enough by themselves.
Unfortunately, the Persian government implemented a number of policies
that only exacerbated the country’s economic woes. Rather than tax
foreign imports, the shahs taxed domestically produced goods.
This further crippled the artisans. Nor were there other tax cuts; all
taxes remained high to pay for the lifestyles of the ruling
elite---which included luxury goods and frequent trips to
Europe.
In 1872 the shah
took a desperate step to turn the economy around. Believing that Western
expertise was necessary, he turned over control of practically every
aspect of the Persian economy to Baron Julius von Reuter (a British
citizen). This move backfired horribly: Reuter pushed through more
regulations that benefited British industries at the expense of Persian
competitors. Middle-class Persians also perceived the so-called Reuter
Concession as a source of national humiliation. The shah finally
rescinded the arrangement.
In the 1880s the
shah made a similar concession to British tobacco interests. The
Imperial Tobacco Corporation was given a monopoly over the Persian
tobacco market. The monopoly affected nearly everyone in the production,
sale, and consumption chain. Domestic producers of tobacco had to sell
their tobacco at low prices dictated by the British monopoly. Merchants’
profits were also trimmed, as Imperial Tobacco boosted its own margins.
Finally, consumers were harmed, as retail tobacco prices rose in the
absence of a competitive market.
The disturbances
that followed came to be known as the Tobacco Revolt of 1891. There were
nationwide protests, and officials of the Imperial Tobacco Corporation
were attacked by angry Iranians. The Tobacco Revolt reached its climax
when Iranians boycotted tobacco completely. The shah reluctantly
cancelled the monopoly. But this reversal carried a hefty price: a half
a million pounds in compensatory damages paid to Imperial Tobacco. It
was an expense that the Persian treasury could ill afford.
In a development
that presaged the Islamic Revolution of 1979, Iranian clerics became the
main instigators of the Tobacco Revolt. The clerics had two motives.
First of all, many were dependent on the middle class for financial
support. Secondly, where there were foreign corporations, Western
secular culture could not be far behind. The clerics issued a series of
fatwas (religious commands) against foreigners, foreign
companies, and the use of any product sold by Imperial Tobacco. A potent
mix of religious, economic, and political forces drove the Tobacco
Revolt.
Continue
reading...
Copyright 2005
Beechmont Crest Publishing